Every trade since 2020.
The home page counts from April 1, 2026, the day this site went live. This page shows the full history of the same three strategies in TradingView's Strategy Tester, on the public scripts, sized like my live bots (2.5% of the account risked per trade, up to 5x leverage), fees included.
The full numbers
Read them in this order: the average year, then the worst drop, then the edge. The totals come last for a reason.
| BOT | AVERAGE PER YEAR | MAX DRAWDOWN | PROFIT FACTOR | WIN RATE | TRADES | TOTAL | BUY & HOLD TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC · 6HMar 2020 – Nov 2026 | +113.8% | 42.8% | 2.39 | 22.5% | 80 | +15,323% | +1,024% |
| ETH · 7HOct 2020 – Nov 2026 | +131.1% | 56.9% | 3.27 | 24.6% | 61 | +15,746% | +505% |
| SOL · 5HJun 2021 – Nov 2026 | +112.1% | 42.4% | 2.19 | 25.0% | 72 | +5,512% | +173% |
Source: TradingView Strategy Tester, deep backtest, Bybit perpetual data, each script from the first day TradingView has data for it to November 6, 2026. Average per year = TradingView's annualized return (CAGR). Buy & hold = buying on the first day of the same period and holding to November 6, 2026 (Binance daily prices), with drops of up to 78% (BTC), 82% (ETH) and 97% (SOL) along the way.
About the totals: this is what 5x leverage compounding for five to six years does on paper. Don't expect anything like it. Nobody should, and almost nobody would have sat through a 43–57% drop at 5x to get there. The numbers worth trusting are the profit factor and the drawdown.
What each number means
Profit factor
Total money won divided by total money lost. 2.39 (BTC) means every $1 lost came with $2.39 won. Above 1.5 is a strong edge for a systematic strategy.
Max drawdown
The biggest fall from a high point of the account to a low point, before it recovered. This is the number to look at before you trade any strategy with real money.
Win rate
The share of trades that made money. About 1 in 4 here. That's normal for trend-following: many small losses, and a few big winners that pay for them.
Buy & hold
What you'd have made by just buying the coin on the first day and holding it, and the drop you'd have sat through on the way: up to 78% for BTC, 82% for ETH and 97% for SOL.
Why the drawdowns are deep, and how to make them smaller
These numbers use the same settings as my live bots: 2.5% of the account risked per trade, with up to 5x leverage. Leverage makes the winners bigger, and it makes the losing streaks deeper too. Drops of 50–60% happened along the way.
Risk per trade is the setting that controls this. In my own replication of the BTC script, the same strategy at 1.5% risk made about +3,800% with a max drawdown near 40%; ETH at 1.5% made about +990% with a drawdown near 45%. You can check it: set "Risk % per trade" to 1.5 in the script's settings. Less profit, smaller falls. Choosing that setting for your own money is part of what the Bot Builder Kit walks you through.
How these numbers were made
TradingView's Strategy Tester runs the public v33 scripts on Bybit's USDT perpetual price history: 6H candles for BTC, 7H for ETH, 5H for SOL. Each signal uses only candles that have already closed, so there's no look-ahead. Fees and slippage are included: 0.055% per side on BTC and SOL, 0.033% on ETH, as set in the scripts. The live bots on Bybit run the same rules with the same sizing.
You can rerun everything yourself on TradingView: here's how. Every trade since 2020 is also listed on the trade log.
What these numbers don't promise
This is a backtest: what the rules would have done on past prices. Future markets can behave differently, and no strategy wins forever. Live trading adds its own problems. The home page lists four bugs that cost my live bots real trades before I found them.
The point isn't certainty. It's a positive edge over many trades, tested across bull and bear markets, with the bad years shown alongside the good ones.